God IS Great: The Arrogance of Christopher Hitchens
by kreitsauce on Mar.01, 2009, under Atheism, Bible, Doctrine, Philosophy

Christopher Hitchens
“As I write these words, and as you read them, people of faith are in their different ways planning your and my destruction, and the destruction of all the hard-won human attainments that I have touched upon. Religion poisons everything.” That’s how Christopher Hitchens ends the first chapter of his best-selling book god is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.
Frankly, Hitchens’ book- cover to cover- is nothing more than a rant. It stirs the emotions of the reader, to be sure. It has some facts scattered throughout. It doesn’t have much substance, though. In fact, the thought strikes me that his book is basically nothing more than a 307-page opinion piece gone horribly wrong.
I’d read this book when it first came out, but I thought I’d read it again since I am going to hear him speak soon. I got it used, so as not to contribute in driving up sales. One of the first things that leapt out at me was the incredible arrogance of the book. Now, he hasn’t gone so far as some atheists (who want to refer to themselves as “brights”), but he is incredibly arrogant, nonetheless.
A Proud Look
Wasting no time in flaunting his presumptuousness, on page 7 of his book he says: “How much self-respect must be sacrificed in order that one may squirm continually in awareness of one’s own sin?” Throughout the first few chapters, Hitchens asserts that Christianity is incapable of producing anything “intelligible or noble or inspiring” since the rise of science. He speaks of the wonder, majesty, and mystery of Hawking’s description of event horizon of a black hole and the symmetry of the double helix while he says of Jehovah: “Why, if god was the creator of all things, were we supposed to ‘praise’ him so incessantly for doing what came to him naturally? This seemed servile, apart from anything else.”
One has to wonder where Hitchens thinks the wonder, majesty, and mystery of nature came from in the first place. Art and music do not leap into existence on their own; it takes the will, power, and skill of a creator- a creator with passion and imagination- to form them. If we wonder at the creation, how much more should we wonder at the Creator? Hitchens would do better to be like his colleague Richard Dawkins, who at least admits the desire to feel grateful when he beholds the heavens.
Semi-intelligent Design
From Hitchens’ initial error in being arrogant a host of other problems come forth. For starters, he has espoused a Darwinistic/Atheistic worldview. He says of those that think like him: “We do not rely solely upon science and reason, because these are necessary rather than scientific factors, but we distrust anything that contradicts science or outrages reason.” This truism is not espoused solely by the Darwinistic and Atheistic faithful, however. It is accepted by Christians as well. As I’ve said many times before, Christianity was foundational and not incidental to the modern scientific movement in the West, and I can think of no Christian today that denies the importance of science and reason.
Rather, Christians have exercised reason and interpreted scientific findings (something we all must do) in concluding that there is a flaw in the atheistic and Darwinistic worldviews. “Nothing comes from nothing, nothing ever could,” sang Maria Von Trapp, and she was quite right. Ironically, while Hitchens doesn’t believe in a Creator with a will and an intellect, he cannot avoid projecting those qualities on a theoretical blind process: “Evolution has meant that our prefontal lobes are too small, our adrenal glands are too big, and our reproductive organs apparently designed by committee.”
Standardless Morality
Hitchens also believes that a moral life can be lived apart from God. However, I would ask where Hitchens got the idea that morality and immorality exist. I wonder why he thinks that the moral path is better than the immoral path. If you can get to the top by cheating and swindling and never suffer the consequences you most fear, why not do it? There is no judgment coming in the atheistic worldview. If no one finds out about it, why not go for it?
Humans know that there is a difference between right and wrong, and things such as character and guilt prevent the vast majority of us from doing terrible things. This conscience tells us that there is a “better” and a “worse” in us, and I would say that if there is a “better”, then it is reasonable to assume at some point there is absolute Perfection. If there is absolute perfection, would not this Perfection be the standard for all? A perfect Being is one of the major aspects of the Judeo-Christian God. Hitchens denies the existence of Evil, preferring rather to blame man’s actions on an evolutionary hiccup that has resulted in humans being only partially rational. If this is true, where did the impulse to be good come from? Furthermore, how can I know anything about morality at all if my bodily organs are in control?
Religiosity vs. Relationship
This isn’t to say that Hitchens doesn’t have some leverage in his war against religion. In a sense, religion as we have come to call it does poison everything. Violence done in the name of a god or Eastern religion is tragic. Violence done in the name of Jehovah God is both tragic and grossly hypocritical. Jesus made it quite clear that His Kingdom was not of this world, and Paul said specifically that our weapons are spiritual, not physical. Our Enemy is Satan, not flesh and blood. If humans are made in God’s image and are potential temples for the Holy Spirit, why would any human exercise physical might in the name of God? They wouldn’t.They might have used His name in their crusade, but they have employed nothing of His character and obeyed none of His commands.
While Hitchens may find scientific discoveries “more awe-inspiring than the rantings of the godly”, I would conclude by saying that Christians are not followers of a religion, but partakers of a Relationship with the Divine. Every scientific discovery we make reminds us that “This is My Father’s World.” Every moment we live we are conscious of the fact that it is in Him that we live, and move, and have our being. Every aspect of our lives is a gift from the Creator and Sustainer of life, and we are moved by gratitude to worship and obedience. It is love and awe that is to be the supreme motivator in the Christian life, not fear or lust for power and control.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!3 Comments for this entry
1 Trackback or Pingback for this entry
-
Religulous? Really? « Kreitsauce’s Musings
June 24th, 2009 on 1:33 pm[...] that Bill Maher’s film takes the comedic route to the same destination as Christopher Hitchens’ God is Not Great. In his book, Hitchens says that religion is “violent, irrational, intolerant, allied to racism [...]
March 1st, 2009 on 11:29 pm
Yes, atrocities have been committed in God’s name, but also look at what people have done when trying to eliminate God – Stalin, Mao, Kim Jong-il, just to name a few. Millions and millions killed in an effort to deny religion. It’s not God at fault, it’s human nature.
And if Hitchens finds “scientific discoveries “more awe-inspiring than the rantings of the godly” “, he probably missed the fact that many noted scientists have made incredible discoveries and can still praise their creator: Copernicus, Sir Francis Bacon, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes, Isaac Newton, Boyle, Faraday, Mendel, Kelvin, Planck, and Einstein (while never coming to actual faith, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe).
I agree with you, that God IS great. It’s just a good thing He doesn’t need us to prove it.
March 1st, 2009 on 11:38 pm
Philippa,
I thought it was also odd that Hitchens said that he would be happy to leave the faithful to burn down each others’ place of worship, yet he ignored the fact that those dictators you mentioned in your post went out of their way to wipe out churches. Apparently not all atheists think the same.
Thanks for the comment!
March 2nd, 2009 on 2:38 am
@Kreit
I have never met hitchens in person and probably never will but whatever I have seen of him from debates on youtube, I agree with you that Hitchens does come off as arrogant and his comments are often distasteful. Although I would say the same thing of a few evangelists and christain apologists also – people like dinesh dsouza and pat robertson
However, I don’t see his arrogance as grounds to reject his opinion neither the opinion of dinesh. Pat robertson though is another story
Btw when are you going to hear him speak.
I plan to write a post on atheist morality sometime in the next few months (when i get to it, that is
) and I will send you the link to see what you think of it.
@Phillipa
It seems a constant repitition of Christains to blame atheists for killing milliions when they conveniently ignore the millions christians have killed. The USA with it’s christian values dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and nagasaki and killed 220,000 on the first few days not to mention the thousands killed later as a consequence. The american civil war between christian killed approx 620,000 people. The first world war between christian nations killed approx. 15 million…these are just a few examples and we can find more evidence if you want..so if you admit that atrocities have been committed in god’s name and also by people who didn’t believe in God..how is believing in God a better position to avoid future mass destruction?
“scientists have made incredible discoveries and can still praise their creator:”
I think hitchens is allowed to have his personal opinion just as many scientists have ther personal opinion in spite of the fact that majority of nobel laureates are atheists or agnostics.
Btw if going by your logic, I am sure you would agree that god is the reason people commit crimes because a 1997 survey of the federal bureau of prisons found only 0.21% of inmates to be atheists.
But I know that would be a wrong and unfair conclusion.